Judge largely blocks Tennessee’s porn site age verification law as other states enforce theirs

May Be Interested In:Why the US is freezing as the planet reaches record warmth


NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A Tennessee law requiring pornographic websites to verify their visitors’ age was largely blocked in court before it was to take effect Jan. 1, even as similar laws kicked in for Florida and South Carolina and remained in effect for more than a dozen other states.

On Dec. 30, U.S. District Judge Sheryl Lipman in Memphis ruled that Tennessee’s law would likely suppress the First Amendment free speech rights of adults without actually preventing children from accessing the harmful material in question. The state attorney general’s office is appealing the decision.

The Free Speech Coalition, an adult entertainment trade group, is suing over Tennessee’s law and those in a half-dozen other states. The coalition lists some 19 states that have passed similar laws. One prominent adult website has cut off access in several states due to their laws.

The issue will hit the U.S. Supreme Court for oral arguments regarding Texas’ law next week.

No one voted against Tennessee’s law last year when it passed the Republican-supermajority legislature, and GOP Gov. Bill Lee signed off on it.

The law would require porn websites to verify visitors are at least 18 years old, threatening felony penalties and civil liability possible for violators running the sites. They could match a photo to someone’s ID, or use certain “public or private transactional data” to prove someone’s age. Website leaders could not retain personally identifying information and would have to keep anonymized data.

The Free Speech Coalition and other plaintiffs sued, winning a preliminary injunction that blocks the attorney general from enforcement while court proceedings continue. However, the coalition expressed concern that private lawsuits or actions by individual district attorneys could be possible.

In her ruling, Judge Lipman wrote that parental controls on minors’ devices are more effective and less restrictive.

She wrote that under Tennessee’s law, minors still could access adult sites using VPNs, or virtual private networks, that mask a user’s location. Or, they could view pornographic material on social media sites, which are unlikely to reach the law’s threshold of one-third of its content considered harmful to minors.

The judge also said the impact could be overly broad, potentially affecting other plaintiffs such as an online educational platform focused on sexual wellness.

She noted that Tennessee’s definition of “content harmful to minors” extends to include text. She specifically mentioned that the phrase “the human nipple,” or crude combinations of keyboard characters, would be considered harmful as long as they lack “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.”

Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti’s office is asking the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to let the law take effect as the lawsuit proceeds. His spokesperson, Chad Kubis, noted that other appeals courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, allowed similar laws to take effect.

“The Protect Tennessee Minors Act institutes common sense age verification to stop kids from accessing explicit obscene content while protecting the privacy of adults who choose to do so,” Kubis said.

The Free Speech Coalition has argued the law would be ineffective, unconstitutional and force people to transfer sensitive information.

“This is a deeply flawed law that put website operators at risk of criminal prosecution for something as trivial as a mention of the human nipple,” said Free Speech Coalition Executive Director Alison Boden.

As verification laws took effect in Florida and South Carolina last week, website PornHub cut off access there and posted a message encouraging people to contact political decision-makers. They’ve acted similarly in other states that passed verification requirements.

Judges had paused the laws in Indiana and Texas. But circuit appeals courts stepped in to allow enforcement.

The Supreme Court declined to halt Texas’ law in April while the court action continues. The next step is Supreme Court oral arguments on Jan. 15.

Another age verification law is set to begin in July in Georgia.

share Share facebook pinterest whatsapp x print

Similar Content

Novak Djokovic won an apology from an Australian TV presenter over
TV host issues on-air apology to Djokovic over ‘insulting’ comments
Telstra to splash $700m on AI joint venture
Telstra to splash $700m on AI joint venture
Stylized illustration a door that opens onto a wall of computer code.
Backdoor infecting VPNs used “magic packets” for stealth and security
Download app from appStore
Young Thug’s lawyer escapes jail time after being held in contempt of court. Here’s what to know about the complex RICO trial.
Jimmy Carter remembered, honored in state funeral
Jimmy Carter remembered, honored in state funeral
Where should a 66-year-old invest with a five-year horizon? | Mint
Where should a 66-year-old invest with a five-year horizon? | Mint
Your Daily Digest: Essential Global Updates | © 2025 | Daily News